“The first-ever Choose Privacy Week will take place May 2-8, 2010 and is a new program created by the American Library Association to help librarians organize events in their communities about the role that privacy plays in their lives, why privacy is important, and how their privacy can be compromised on a daily basis.”

The movie is a treasure trove in defining the modern privacy and integrity problems that have been escalating for the last few decades in a well-rounded sort of way. I can’t help but feel that there’s an important piece of the puzzle missing though, and it’s only touched upon briefly at the very end of the video: that privacy is a changing and evolving concept, and that privacy is different, depending on the context.

When I was studying Japanese, there was a rather interesting passage we read in school regarding privacy. In essence, privacy was not only an unheard of concept in Japan back in the day, but it was in fact detrimental to the health of society at the time. Not knowing where Tanaka-san the fisherman had gone off to last night could very well lead to his demise, because the members of his village didn’t go look for him in the woods (maybe he’d broken a leg due to a bad fall or something).

While Japan today might seem like a very private place, and while people are far less inclined to tell you what they feel or think, the Japanese do not hold privacy very high — at least not digital privacy, or rights online. Every single click you make is scanned and compared and analyzed. I know this first-hand, because I was the subject of several threatening letters related to copyright infringement, and the crime which I supposedly committed did not become a law until the year after I left Japan. Summarily, the ISP kept tabs, not to obey the law, but to appease whatever company paid them to keep tabs on their users — us.

Think about that for a second. They didn’t have to. But they did.

A friend of mine, when he signed up for an internet service with an ISP in Osaka, was asked whether he wanted the “service” of the ISP being able to at any given time look at his monitor and see what he was doing. All he had to do was install this piece of software.

He declined. The representative was flabbergasted. So was my friend’s girlfriend. In the end, the girlfriend had to tell the guy, “I’m sorry, he’s Swedish, they’re like this,” to which he apparently gave an uncertain nod and nixed it from the list of “services”.

Alongside this event, my teacher in school brings up the subject of privacy and of school records of children, that these records are sold to corporations and that said corporations use them to market their products (“Your daughter turns 20 this year, right?” – “Yes she does, actually, why?” – “Have you gotten a kimono arranged for her yet? If not, our company specializes in coming-of-age ceremony kimonos and would be honored to help you out.” I believe was the (fake) scenario depicted in the school text). My teacher pointed out the horrors of this unjust behavior, and all the while, her computer at home can at the flip of a switch be monitored by her ISP — judging from that rep’s reaction, not a lot of people decline that wonderful offer.

Privacy in a small village is not the same as privacy in a metropolitan city, nor does it work the same. Privacy in Japan is obviously not the same as privacy in Sweden. Privacy for a 15-year old isn’t the same as privacy for a 50-year old. It’s being redefined beneath our feet, and refined to fit niches and groups on a more precise and specific level.

In the Choose Privacy Week movie, a lot is being said about one’s actions online being permanent — no matter how many delete keys you press, once you’ve hit “send” on that email, or that forum post, or even blog post, you’re stuck with that information online, spreading completely outside of your control, which, unless you happen to be a marketing firm, can be a rather painful and destructive thing to have happen. Posting your age or phone number or interests on Facebook will inevitably mean that said information is processed and turned into a package deal that is sold to whoever pays enough.

“Why do free social networks tilt inevitably toward user exploitation? Because you’re not their customer, you’re their product.”
– Tim Spalding (via Cory Doctorow on Twitter).

At 360iDev as well as at the Voices That Matter iPhone conference, a recurring concept was that of “mining your users to better understand your own product”. The concept is as follows: track every keypress, track every page flip, track everything your user inputs into your application and feed it to your central server. Process that information, and figure out vital things such as which features users tend to use, and even more importantly, which features users tend to not use, in order for you to over time tailor your app to suit the needs of your users better and better.

My immediate reaction to this was “dear fuck, what about privacy?” and from what I can tell, Apple supposedly ensures that users do not mine sensitive data, and apparently also cracks down on misuse of said data. But Apple’s not exactly the ideal privacy protecting superhero, except in that they’d lose reputation (and cash) if it was leaked that their applications, well, leaked.

Regardless, it is an under-advertised “feature” that whatever app you install on your i* has the ability to feed a central server somewhere with information about everything you do in it. And it doesn’t have to tell you (as opposed to when it wants to track your current location). (As a sidenote, do you think Apple’s servers need to ask you for permission finding your iPhone? Not really, as any MobileMe account holder can (contentedly/relievedly) affirm, since it’s possible to locate your phone remotely online.)

The internet, and the world, has been steadily moving toward a new form of privacy. People like Cory Doctorow are (and rightly so) advocating more protection of user’s integrity, but the user him/herself keep taking steps further and further into, well, the light. We’re opening ourselves up more and more as we encloud ourselves and place more and more of us out there. Gmail online, not POP3. Google, which (in an open, we’re-harmless-we-promise sort of way) tracks your searches to tailor your results after your specific interests, blogs, where we exhale slowly, Twitter, where we do it quickly, IM’s, Facebook, where we tell everyone who’s listening exactly who we are and who we know… there’s not a lot that we’re not saying anymore.

In fact, I’d wager that the only things we’re not saying are the things we want to keep to ourselves. But we slip, we’re human. We blurt a little too much, in a blog, a forum, on IM’s, in an email, somewhere, and it’s stored and analyzed and categorized. And I’m not just being paranoid.

Sometimes we don’t even have to say anything at all. Guilt by association has been turned into an art form by the witch hunt for terrorists and/or evildoers of various kind. I have friends who are republicans and friends who are democrats, friends who are communists, or extreme-right wing nuts, gay friends, straight friends, old and young friends, I have friends who hate cops, Christian friends, atheist friends, muslim friends, and the list goes on — the very dirty-laundry sort of list. One might argue whether being friends with a right-wing nut is appropriate at all, but I can’t really choose my friends’ political views, and you’d be surprised at the level of intellectual capacity even certain right-wing nuts might have.

One of my more verbal friends had a blog once. He’d talk about everything and anything. One day, he applied for a job and got an interview. They were excited. He seemed like the man for the job. Then bam, they told him to continue searching. The reason? They’d Google’d his name and found his blog, and couldn’t have someone with his opinions in their work place. Trouble maker. His blog is no more.

Our privacy isn’t what it used to be. Jesse Schell talks a little about this in his DICE2010 talk labeled “Design Outside the Box“, a talk which I wholeheartedly recommend anyone remotely interested in game design, or the future for that matter. He describes “the future” as a place where every move we make is tracked and analyzed by machines, where our corn flakes box lets us play a game as we eat our corn flakes and see our points compared to our friends that week; he talks about how our future selves will read a book on our Kindle and get an achievement that we’ve read our thousandth book, and that we’d be embarrassed that our thousandth book was a stupid Star Trek novel. That we’d stop to think and realize that we didn’t know what our grandparents read, but our grandchildren will be able to see exactly everything we did and read and that maybe, we should try to be a little better and do better things with our lives… (except he says it much better — just watch it until the end, even though it’s close to 30 minutes long).

And maybe that’s precisely it. The inevitable truth is, we — the remnants of us that fear the loss of privacy and try to maintain it in some form, traditional or not — are fighting a losing battle, and sooner or later, everything we do will be registered and monitored and tracked and analyzed. I’m not even going to bother reassuring you that this isn’t paranoid thinking — if you think it is, seriously, you’ve gotta start reading the news, buddy. Or just reading, period.

But let’s look at it from a different perspective, by giving a small analogy. In a village with 100 villagers, privacy is non-existent. It is, because everyone knows everything about everyone. There is no privacy to be had in an environment like that. Old Joe Schmoe can’t get an erection anymore, and everyone knows, because that’s just how it is. Joe might feel infuriated and insulted about it, but at least the rest of the world doesn’t know about his predicament — small comfort to Joe, but relevant to our analogy.

In a big metropolitan city, Joe’s predicament is except in rare cases not known by anyone, or known only to those close to Joe himself. Him, his doctor, his significant other, and that’s probably it. Privacy is greater, because there are more people to blend into. We’re more anonymous.

Then we have the internet. The internet is the mutt, the screwed-up offspring of the village mentality of everybody knowing everything and the metropolitan anonymity of blending into the masses. It’s the ants on your TV when the crows ate your antenna. Black. White. White. Black. Black. Nothing is really gray here. More people know about more people. More people are famous for lesser reasons. Just take a moment and marvel at all the (ridiculous, one might accuse) “online celebrities” and what they’ve done to become so known to the world. That guy who cried about leaving Britney Spears alone? That kid with the laser sabre whom found himself the subject of countless “re-makes” where people did everything from turning his wooden stick into a real live zzzzzzmmm-yowling sabre to ridiculing him mercilessly. If I recall right, his parents tried to raise a fuss about it, but what’s there to do about it, anyway? It’s out there. No amount of hitting ‘delete’ is going to take it away.

Posterity online is a phenomenon all by itself. It’s like the subject of an immensely intricate equation, where week-old stuff vanishes without a trace and decades-old stuff remains. Those deemed famous by the online community will linger for who knows how long — maybe forever.

We fool ourselves, thinking that with the masses and masses of information online, we are the untraceable needle in the haystack, but the internet is evolving as rapidly as the content in which we aim to hide grows — if you’ve ever whined about a company on Twitter, you might have had the pleasant surprise of said company responding to your tweet. Just by writing the right keyword into your message, they get it fed to them via Twitter’s own search feature. Do you know how much information passes through Twitter in a day?

“By the end of 2007, about 500,000 tweets per quarter were posted. By the end of 2008, 100 million tweets per quarter were posted. By the end of 2009, 2 billion tweets per quarter were posted. In the first quarter of 2010, 4 billion tweets per quarter were posted.” (bolded by author)
– http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter

4 billion tweets per quarter. Or roughly 50 million tweets a day. If every tweet averages at 100 letters, that’s 5 billion letters. Every day (this entire post counts 15k letters — the same amount is tweeted in one fourth of a second). If a company can find the mention of their name in 50 million tweets a day — 600 tweets a second — just like that, that probably means your “blending into the crowd” trick is flawed.

We aren’t used to this but the kids of our time are. How will they define privacy as adults, having been surrounded by the perpetual lure of providing more and more pieces of themselves to perfect the product that they are to Facebook or whatever may take its place in the future. They will inevitably see those around them lifted up into the light from the shadows of anonymity, to be ridiculed or praised or both, and then cast aside when they no longer provide entertainment for the masses. Their friends will be the rock stars and celebrities we could only see at a distance, stalked and exposed to anyone who cared. They will learn to deal with the public continuum that surrounds, even dictates, their lives. Privacy won’t be then what it is today, but the people of that time will know, on a near instinctual level, how to cope with and remain private. Privacy won’t be then what it is today, but perhaps we can guide the evolution of it onto a democratic path.

Meanwhile, before you go to that job interview — or go on that overseas trip, try Googling your full name or nick name, skim your blog for objectionable content, scan your Twitter feed, and come up with good responses for when they ask you about it. Presuming they even bother to ask.

I’ve been a linux user for the last decade. More, even. I’ve had brief encounters with Windows, most of them horrific, all of them resulting in me eventually giving up and going back to linux, and none of them in the last 5+ years. I hear Windows is getting better, but as we say in Sweden, “bränt barn skyr elden*,” and I’ve come to the realization that I will most likely never use Windows again, even though I’m pleased to hear it’s shapening up after all these years.

One might say I’m a hard-to-please customer. Some might even accuse me of being the worst kind ever. I whine about things that don’t do their jobs, and even if they’re open source and free as in liberty, it doesn’t mean I won’t complain when they can’t do their jobs properly. I recently spew pus over PulseAudio and Ubuntu 9.10 — the worst experience since 1990 — and I stand by what I said, but in the end, I love linux, and it’s unfair to blame it all on the system, when there are so many factors out of the developers’ control.

Hardware manufacturers couldn’t give less of a fuck about linux, unless they’re making server-specific hardware.
Software manufacturers couldn’t give less of a fuck about linux, unless they’re making server-specific software.

It makes for a really ugly scene, sometimes, and people have to jump through living lions while spinning firey globes of radioactive customs officers through quality assurance managers. It’s messy, and it takes hours and pain, lots of both.

And this is an ongoing perpetual circle, where new hardware and new software clashes and collides over and over, year in and year out, in the uphill battle that is the linux desktop scene.

One of the most annoying things about being a linux user isn’t necessarily that hardware and software manufacturers piss in your corn flakes. It can be really frustrating when you’re struggling to get something working and someone goes, “Why are you using that piece of shit anyway. Linux sucks man. Just install Windows.”

Twitch. I mean, dude. Twitch. I don’t think there’s anyone out there as defensive and protective of their operating system as the linux user. We’re the first to take offense when someone tells us linux sucks. You tell a Windows user that Windows sucks and the most probable reply you’ll get is, “Uh-huh, I know that.**”

Sigh. So retarded. Well, I’ve gotten better about that, and these days I don’t have an agenda against anyone. I just know what works for me and what doesn’t, and whatever works for you, you should stick to. I still get picked on for my choice of OS though, playfully of course, and so the last couple of weeks my guilty pleasure has been to say things like:

“Damn, handbrake seems full of win. And it’s available for linux too. (And Windows, but who cares..)”

on Twitter. Which is fed to Google’s Buzz, which appears for some of the people who tend to poke fun at me. Now I’m poking back.

Joke aside, it’s interesting how the tables have turned. One of my best friends who’s a hardcore Windows user (and a skilled tech guy at that) and I have been discussing the whole linux/Windows deal for more or less ten years, and suddenly I’m waving my i*s around and talking about the innovative and prosperous market, while he’s pointing to Android and upcoming tablets that will potentially turn the tide on Apple’s tidal wave of domination. He’s suddenly wielding the open source cap and I’m wielding the closed source proprietary cap. And it happened overnight! Granted, his change isn’t as dramatic as mine — he’s simply opposed to the Mac experience, and will grab at anything that means not having to use a Mac (including some of the Win7 devices that are closing in on the market). In my case it’s a little more extreme, but in the end, I’m just excited about a rare opportunity. In the end, I do not believe the i*s will control the market, but I believe they will lead the way, and I’m excited to be a part of that process, even if it’s an unsignificant part.

—

(* “burnt child fears fire”)

(** except for that one guy in Wisconsin who got real offensive about Windows when *I* said it sucked; never mind me being a hypocrite, but I was completely taken by surprise by this reaction, and immediately labeled him a confused patriot thinking Windows somehow was connected to the pride of America)

Update: timely — MS cancels their “iPad killer”: http://gizmodo.com/5527442/microsoft-cancels-innovative-courier-tablet-project

Kendall Gelner, Noel Llopis, and many other hugely talented but yet pleasant to be around folks were inspiring.

Only thing I regret about the thing was eating those veggie burritos. Man they were grody.

iPadDevCamp was a super-intensive “hack something together a-zap and present it two days later” thing. Actually it was roughly 1 whole day of working, with only a few hours on the Friday eve and Sunday morning to do last minute fixes. I ended up with a group of 4 others doing a ‘multi-device game’ called (eventually) Tank or Die. The idea was to be able to add iPhones as game controllers and iPads as playing fields in this ‘control the tank and try to shoot the other tanks’. There were 3 developers (4 even) and one graphics designer. Everyone decided to start working on things on Friday, but due to transportation issues, I couldn’t actually join them until Saturday. My task ended up being the connectivity between iPads (the playing fields) and I just didn’t have enough time to figure out how to get it all working in time for the demo, so when we won “best game” award, I felt a bit like a cheater when I took that wireless keyboard from the prize pile.

Was a learning experience though, and I don’t regret participating. It’s a very nice feeling when you are convinced that “if I were tasked to do this with the things I know today, I would have succeeded”, and I am.

Now I’m going to be doing some work and relax until Friday, when I go up to Seattle for the last conference in my “conference tour”.

This is an unexpected turn of events. Apple with its “closed” approach versus Adobe with ITS “closed” approach leading to more openness. Two wrongs do not make one right, you say, and I point at this wonderful, glorious exception of where just precisely that is happening. The very nature of “closed” means you can shut out whoever you want however you want, and Adobe in all of its proprietary glory shuts pretty much everyone except Windows users out (yea, Flash runs horrible on the Mac apparently, it’s a resource hog, and crashes constantly).

And Apple shuts Adobe out. Do you hear my giggles as I wheeze for breath?

It reminds me of MSIE back in the day. It was THE browser. The alternative was Netscape Navigator and it was a disastrous piece of crap where Internet Explorer was a shiny piece of solid gold. So developers ignored everything else. Even when Firefox came around, they continued doing so, at least the short bus folks did. Fuck web standards. Then suddenly, their “dis sait rekirs intrnet exprdorerlolstfu” sites were hurting, badly.

But it took a long while. Banks in Sweden required Internet Explorer up until a mere few years ago. My mother’s stock market site (uh yeah, my mom’s dealing in stock, but that’s another story) even to this day requires Internet Explorer.

Now we have Flash, and we see people doing the same mistake all over again. Especially with the web as it is today, with video content and all that, it’s no wonder people are going for Flash, because Flash is pretty much the only alternative. Well, sort of, anyway. Ah-yep-. If you clicked the link you probably noticed that it said “HTML5″ and if that didn’t mean much to you, let me rephrase:

No Flash.

Actually, I can rephrase that even nicer:

No Proprietary One-Company-To-Rule-Them-All Plugins Required.

Did I mention that HTML5 video is supported by the iPhone?

As a developer, this is the part where you go look at the figures for exactly how many people own an iPhone. And the part where you take a stand on whether the iPad will sell to millions or if it’ll flop over and keel. This is the part where you get the numbers fed to you: 42.5 million.

Forty two point five million iPhones as of Q1 2010. And your cute, bunny-hopping Flash-site? It’s a fucking piece of Lego right now, for those 42.5 million users when they browse on their phone.